Is this what [is] referencing here? Who knows, who cares. […] Importantly, we know it cannot ever be appealed to as “genuinely known”.
No axiomatic system is both complete or consistent. This has some major repercussions on governance.
We try to avoid being in situations where our choices are limited. This happens in one of two ways: gaining power or committing to impotence.
Having what can be distributed is – definitionally and factually – “socially normal”; anything less is propaganda.
While posts are being neglected, it is intentional. I’m working on a new project. This post is an update on it.
We should have seen this coming. [We can prevent things like this in the future.] Let us learn from the family Rusk and try to be better.
Regardless of what is “true”, finding the situation in which the least people suffer is the optimal decision.
The most tragic prisoner is the one that believes his cage is the universe. This is especially tragic when we realize that most cages are used for protection from what is outside.
Much of our interaction with society isn’t thought about through risk, but how we expect it to work and how we fill the gaps.
Without contrast, paradise is a prison.