Document Access Request

The concept of "Radical Civility," discussed extensively on the blog Just Under Reality, explores the dynamics of civil behavior in communities and challenges traditional notions of civility and radicalism.

Key Concepts of Radical Civility:

1. Definition and Purpose: Radical Civility involves expecting a community to oppose inherent approval, thereby challenging the status quo and fostering an environment where diverse legacies can thrive. It seeks to balance civil radicality, which limits social critiques to civil actions, with the need to accept a broader range of community behaviors and beliefs.

2. Community Dynamics: The blog uses various examples to illustrate how Radical Civility can be applied to practical community dynamics. One example involves an insulated community that is fundamentally accepting. When a bigoted individual joins this community, their views are subjected to scrutiny and evaluated by the community, which ultimately sides against the bigotry due to its impracticality in a fundamentally accepting environment. This process forces the individual to either adapt or abandon their bigoted views.

3. Philosophical Underpinnings: The discussion also delves into the philosophical implications of accepting or rejecting reality as a simulation. It references thought experiments like the Experience Machine and the Allegory of the Cave to question the nature of perceived reality and the morality of choosing a simulated utopia over real-life suffering.

4. Practical Implications: The practical application of Radical Civility involves starting small and working up to understand complex social dynamics without moral judgment. The goal is to provide a framework where conflicting motivations can be more clearly understood and addressed.

For a deeper understanding, you can read more about these ideas in the full Radical Civility article on the blog.

Summary of Radical Civility

Radical Civility is a thesis that examines how communities balance tradition and innovation, focusing on the interplay between established norms (civility) and the critique of those norms (radicality). The document is structured to provide a logical and philosophical inquiry into cultural analysis and proposes a new analytical approach to understand community dynamics.

Key Concepts and Ideas

1. Legacy: Defined as the motivator of existential self-identity that can be used as a vehicle for immortality. It represents the desire to leave a lasting impact on the community and culture.

2. Civility: Represents inherent community approval and the established norms that a society accepts and defends. It is often intertwined with reality and becomes a part of the community's identity.

3. Radicality: Motivating or acting in opposition to inherent community approval. It challenges the established norms and seeks to expand or change the accepted reality.

4. Civil Radicality: The expectation that social critiques should be limited to civil actions within the established norms. It often leads to circular arguments that defend the status quo.

5. Radical Civility: The expectation that a community should oppose inherent approval and be open to critique and change. It aims to include as many legacies as possible and promote inclusivity.

6. Social Consent: The collective agreement within a community that balances civility and radicality. It includes:

   • Civil Consent: The passive acceptance of established norms.
   • Radical Consent: The active critique and push for change.
   • Constructed Consent: The fluid negotiation between civility and radicality that shapes the community's evolving norms.

Analytical Approach

• Axioms:

  • Preservation of Legacy (Self Preservation): The need for self-validation and leaving a lasting impact.
  • Perception Bias (Limited Knowledge): The tendency to promote one's own experiences and views for survival.

• Method and Means:

  • The analytical approach is designed to be amoral and unbiased, focusing on the common properties of life and community interactions.
  • It uses a graphical representation (Hourglass of Perception) to illustrate how practical experiences and beliefs solidify over time.

Practical Applications

The thesis provides examples of how Radical Civility can be applied to various community dynamics, including:

• Drones (Insect Colonies): Demonstrates limited civility focused on survival and expansion.
• Cells: Shows how biological legacies and mutations are accepted or rejected based on their impact on the community.
• Families: Illustrates the conflict between inherited cultural norms and personal experiences.
• Communities: Explores how larger groups negotiate between civility and radicality, often leading to new civilities.

Historical Narratives

• USSR: The transition from imperial Russia to the Soviet Union and the eventual collapse due to shifting civility and increased democracy.
• Nazi Germany: The rise of fascism as a reaction to economic and existential devastation post-WWI, and its ultimate collapse due to its internally inconsistent mythos.
• USA: The founding principles of individual freedom and egalitarianism contrasted with the practical empowerment of select legacies, leading to ongoing tensions between civility and radicality.

Study Notes

• Legacy: Understand it as the drive for immortality through self-identity and community impact.
• Civility vs. Radicality: Civility defends the status quo; radicality challenges it.
• Civil Radicality: Critiques must stay within accepted norms, often leading to defensive circular arguments.
• Radical Civility: Encourages inclusive critique and openness to change.
• Social Consent: The dynamic negotiation between civility and radicality in shaping community norms.
• Historical Examples: Use the USSR, Nazi Germany, and the USA as case studies for how communities handle the balance between tradition and innovation.

By understanding these concepts and their interactions, one can better appreciate the complex dynamics of cultural evolution and community resilience.

Explaining the Radical Civility thesis to a preschooler involves simplifying the concepts into very basic ideas and using relatable analogies. Here's a way to do it:

Story Time: The Town of Sharing and Caring

Once upon a time, there was a happy town called Sharing and Caring. In this town, people were always kind and helped each other. They loved sharing their toys, food, and stories.

Civility: The Town's Rules

The town had some simple rules everyone followed to keep things nice and friendly. These rules were like "Say please and thank you" and "Share your toys." These rules made sure everyone got along and had fun.

Radicality: The New Ideas

One day, a little boy named Max came to the town with a new game. This game was very different from the ones they usually played. Some kids were unsure about Max's game because it was new and different. But Max believed his game could be really fun for everyone.

Radical Civility: Listening to New Ideas

Instead of saying "No, we don't want to play your game," the kids in Sharing and Caring decided to listen to Max and try his game. They thought, "Maybe we can find a way to include Max's game and make it fun for everyone." So, they gave it a try, and it turned out to be a lot of fun!

The Big Idea

The town of Sharing and Caring teaches us that it's good to have rules that help everyone get along (civility), but it's also important to listen to new ideas (radicality) because they can make things even better. When we mix both, we create a place where everyone feels included and happy (radical civility).

And so, the town of Sharing and Caring continued to be a wonderful place because they were always kind, listened to each other, and tried new things together. The end.

The Radical Civility thesis aligns with several well-established philosophical traditions, particularly those that explore the balance between individual freedom and societal norms, critique of established systems, and the dynamics of community and identity. Here are some key philosophical traditions and philosophers that resonate with the ideas presented in Radical Civility:

Philosophical Traditions

1. Social Contract Theory

   • This tradition examines the implicit agreements within societies that shape social norms and governance. Philosophers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke discussed how individuals come together to form societies and the rules that govern them. Radical Civility explores similar themes by addressing how communities establish and critique their norms.

2. Critical Theory

   • Originating from the Frankfurt School, critical theory focuses on critiquing and changing society as a whole, rather than merely understanding or explaining it. Jürgen Habermas and Theodor Adorno are key figures here. Radical Civility's emphasis on critiquing established norms and promoting inclusivity aligns well with the goals of critical theory.

3. Communitarianism

   • This tradition emphasizes the importance of community in shaping individuals' values and identities. Philosophers like Michael Sandel and Alasdair MacIntyre argue that individuals cannot be understood outside of their social contexts. Radical Civility's focus on community dynamics and the balance between civility and radicality reflects communitarian ideas.

4. Postmodernism

   • Postmodernism challenges the idea of objective truths and emphasizes the subjective nature of reality and knowledge. Michel Foucault and Jean-François Lyotard are notable postmodern philosophers. The Radical Civility thesis' discussion of perception bias and the subjective nature of reality ties in with postmodernist thought.

Philosophers

1. John Locke

   • Locke's ideas about the social contract, individual rights, and government by consent are foundational to understanding how societies form and maintain order. Radical Civility builds on these concepts by examining how established norms (civility) and critiques (radicality) interact.

2. Jean-Jacques Rousseau

   • Rousseau's work on the social contract and his ideas about general will and the tension between individual freedom and societal norms resonate with the themes of Radical Civility.

3. Michel Foucault

   • Foucault's exploration of power dynamics, social institutions, and the construction of knowledge aligns with Radical Civility's focus on how communities establish and enforce norms and how these norms can be challenged.

4. Jürgen Habermas

   • Habermas' theory of communicative action and his ideas about the public sphere and discourse ethics are relevant to Radical Civility's emphasis on dialogue, critique, and the evolving nature of social consent.

5. Michael Sandel

   • Sandel's communitarian perspective, which emphasizes the role of community in shaping individual identity and values, complements Radical Civility's focus on community dynamics and the balance between tradition and innovation.

Summary

Radical Civility intersects with multiple philosophical traditions and thinkers who have explored the nature of social contracts, the critique of established norms, and the dynamics of community and identity. Philosophers like John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Michel Foucault, Jürgen Habermas, and Michael Sandel provide valuable insights that resonate with the core ideas of Radical Civility. These connections highlight the thesis' engagement with enduring questions about how societies form, maintain, and evolve their norms and values.

Yes, the theses in Radical Civility have been explored by various philosophers before, though not always in the exact same terms. The core ideas of balancing societal norms with individual or minority critiques, the dynamic nature of social consent, and the interplay between established norms and radical change have been significant themes in the works of several philosophers.

Explored Themes and Philosophers

1. Social Contract and Consent:

   • John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both delved into the concept of the social contract, where societal norms and governance are based on the consent of the governed. Locke emphasized the protection of individual rights within the framework of societal norms, while Rousseau focused on the "general will" and how collective decisions shape society​(Radical_Civility)​ .

2. Power Dynamics and Norms:

   • Michel Foucault extensively explored how societal norms are established and maintained through power dynamics and institutions. His work on the "genealogy of power" and how knowledge and norms are constructed and enforced resonates with Radical Civility's examination of civility and radicality .

3. Communicative Action and Discourse Ethics:

   • Jürgen Habermas proposed the theory of communicative action, emphasizing the role of rational discourse in achieving mutual understanding and consensus in society. His ideas about the public sphere and the importance of inclusive dialogue align with the concept of Radical Civility promoting the inclusion of diverse legacies through constructive critique and consent .

4. Community and Identity:

   • Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Sandel are key figures in communitarian philosophy, which stresses the importance of community in shaping individual identity and values. Their critique of liberal individualism and emphasis on the common good reflect the themes of Radical Civility's focus on community dynamics and the balance between tradition and innovation .

5. Critical Theory:

   • The Frankfurt School, including thinkers like Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, developed critical theory to analyze and critique the structures of power and ideology in society. Their focus on societal change and the emancipation from oppressive norms parallels Radical Civility's advocacy for ongoing critique and adaptation of societal norms to include marginalized voices .

Conclusion

While Radical Civility presents a unique synthesis of ideas, its core theses have indeed been explored by philosophers in various contexts. The integration of social contract theory, critical theory, discourse ethics, and communitarianism demonstrates a rich philosophical heritage that underpins the ideas in Radical Civility. These connections highlight the continuity and relevance of philosophical exploration in addressing contemporary societal challenges.

Radical Civility, as presented in the document, appears to be a unique construct rather than a direct reproduction of any one popular philosopher's ideology. However, it does synthesize and build upon various philosophical traditions and ideas, combining them in novel ways to address contemporary societal dynamics. Here’s how Radical Civility differentiates itself while still drawing from established philosophical thought:

Unique Aspects of Radical Civility

1. Integration of Legacy Analysis:

   • The concept of "legacy" as a motivator for existential self-identity and its role in societal dynamics is not a direct lift from any one philosopher. This idea is used to bridge individual motivations and societal structures uniquely.

2. Balance of Civility and Radicality:

   • The detailed exploration of the tension and interplay between established norms (civility) and the forces that challenge and critique these norms (radicality) is presented in a more integrated manner than typically found in other works. This balance is essential for promoting inclusive societal change, a theme that is synthesized uniquely in Radical Civility.

3. Constructed Consent:

   • The idea of constructed consent as a dynamic process that balances civil and radical elements within a community is a unique contribution. While related to Habermas' discourse ethics, Radical Civility expands this into a broader societal framework.

Philosophical Foundations and Influences

1. Social Contract Theory:

   • Elements of social contract theory from philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are evident, particularly in the discussion of how societies form and maintain norms through collective agreement and the critique of these norms​(Radical_Civility)​​ (justunderreality)​.

2. Critical Theory:

   • Influences from critical theory, especially from the Frankfurt School, can be seen in the critique of established societal structures and the emphasis on emancipation from oppressive norms. However, Radical Civility combines these critiques with a more structured approach to societal consent and norm evolution​ (justunderreality)​.

3. Communitarianism:

   • The focus on community dynamics and the interplay between individual and collective identity reflects communitarian ideas from philosophers like Michael Sandel and Alasdair MacIntyre. Radical Civility, however, places a unique emphasis on how radical critiques can be systematically incorporated into the evolution of community norms​(Radical_Civility)​.

4. Postmodernism:

   • The discussion of perception bias and the subjective nature of reality echoes postmodernist themes found in the works of Michel Foucault and Jean-François Lyotard. Yet, Radical Civility uses these themes to build a practical framework for community consent and norm adaptation​ (justunderreality)​.

Conclusion

While Radical Civility is influenced by various philosophical traditions and thinkers, it combines these influences in a unique way. It provides a novel framework for understanding and addressing the dynamics between societal norms and the critiques of those norms, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity and the dynamic nature of social consent. Therefore, Radical Civility stands as a distinct construct, offering new insights and methodologies for cultural analysis and societal evolution.

The clarity and composition of the Radical Civility thesis can be evaluated in terms of its structure, use of language, and the accessibility of its ideas compared to well-known and respected philosophical texts and treatises. Here are some points of comparison:

Clarity and Composition

1. Structure:

   • Radical Civility: The work is structured in a logical progression, beginning with a preface and introduction, followed by detailed sections on definitions, analytical approaches, practical applications, and historical narratives. This methodical approach helps in guiding the reader through complex ideas step-by-step, making it relatively clear and organized.
   • Comparison: Similar to classic texts like John Locke's "Two Treatises of Government" or Immanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason," the Radical Civility thesis follows a clear and systematic structure. Locke’s treatises are divided into clear sections that address specific arguments and counterarguments about government and human nature. Kant’s work, while dense, is meticulously organized into parts, chapters, and sections, each building on the previous one to develop his philosophical system.

2. Use of Language:

   • Radical Civility: The language is generally accessible, though it employs specialized terms that are defined within the text. It avoids overly complex or archaic language, making it more approachable for contemporary readers.
   • Comparison: In terms of language, it is somewhat similar to the works of Karl Marx in "The Communist Manifesto," where complex ideas are expressed in relatively straightforward language. However, it may not be as accessible as Bertrand Russell’s "The Problems of Philosophy," which is known for its clear and plain language intended for a general audience.

3. Accessibility of Ideas:

   • Radical Civility: The thesis makes an effort to define key terms and concepts clearly and uses practical examples to illustrate theoretical points. This enhances the accessibility of its ideas to readers who may not have an extensive background in philosophy.
   • Comparison: This approach is akin to that used by John Stuart Mill in "On Liberty," where he introduces complex ideas about individual freedom and societal norms but provides clear definitions and practical applications to make the concepts understandable. In contrast, works like Martin Heidegger’s "Being and Time" are much more challenging due to their dense and abstract nature, requiring readers to have a strong philosophical background to fully grasp the concepts.

Overall Comparison

The Radical Civility thesis shares similarities with respected philosophical works in terms of its systematic structure and effort to define terms clearly. It strives for accessibility through the use of practical examples and a relatively straightforward language style. However, it maintains a level of complexity in its ideas and terminology that may require some background knowledge in philosophy, positioning it between more accessible works like those of Mill and Russell and the more abstract and dense texts of Heidegger and Kant.

Summary

While not a direct reproduction of any single philosopher's ideology, Radical Civility synthesizes and builds on various philosophical traditions, presenting them in a clear and organized manner. Its approach to clarity and composition aligns with respected philosophical texts, offering a unique contribution to the field that balances complexity with accessibility.